Market News
Nigeria is flaring the answer to the world’s biggest tech problem - BUSINESSDAY
The global AI power crisis and Nigeria’s gas flaring epidemic are not two problems. They are one.
Every day, Nigeria burns approximately 192 million standard cubic feet of natural gas – gas with no buyer, no pipe, and no use. It simply flares into the atmosphere. The World Bank confirmed in 2025 that Nigeria recorded the second-highest increase in gas flaring intensity globally that year. Since 2002, the country has forfeited an estimated $56.75 billion in direct revenue from gas it chose to burn rather than commercialise. This is not a new problem. What is new is the context that makes it, suddenly, an extraordinary opportunity.
The global artificial intelligence industry is in an energy crisis. Data centres, the physical infrastructure that runs AI systems, now consume electricity at an industrial scale, and demand is growing at roughly four times the rate of all other sectors combined. The International Energy Agency projects that global data centre power consumption will nearly double by 2030. Microsoft, Google, and Amazon are signing energy deals at a scale not seen since heavy industry peaked in the twentieth century. The primary bottleneck constraining AI expansion is no longer capital or talent. It is power. And the markets that have historically hosted this infrastructure – Northern Virginia, Dublin, Singapore – are running out of it. Average grid connection wait times in these markets now exceed four years
Nigeria’s flared gas has the potential to generate approximately 3,400 megawatts of electricity, almost matching Nigeria’s entire current national grid output. The Petroleum Industry Act (2021) has already created a legal pathway for private investors to capture this gas at near-zero fuel cost through the Nigerian Gas Flare Commercialisation Programme. Thirty-eight companies have permits. The regulatory architecture exists. What does not yet exist is the coordinated strategy to direct that energy toward the AI data centre opportunity before competing African markets capture it first.
The gas Nigeria burns daily could power the data centres that the world’s AI industry is desperately searching for.
Lagos holds a further advantage that is underappreciated outside specialist circles. Several major submarine fibre optic cables land in Lagos, including Google’s Equiano cable and the 2Africa cable connecting 33 countries, giving Nigeria some of the highest international bandwidth capacity in Africa.
Bandwidth is the second prerequisite for hyperscale data centre operations, after power. Lagos has both potential. This is not a common combination on the continent.
The competitive window is real but narrow. Kenya secured a $1 billion combined Microsoft and Google data centre investment in 2024, anchored by geothermal power. South Africa has Google and AWS cloud regions operational. Egypt is advancing its own strategy with EU and hyperscaler backing. Nigeria is not yet behind, but the gap between first mover and follower in infrastructure investment is measured in years, not decades, and it compounds.
Perhaps the most striking validation of this thesis is a personnel decision made quietly last year. When OpenAI sought a board director to guide its infrastructure and energy strategy, it appointed Adebayo Ogunlesi, the Founding Partner of Global Infrastructure Partners (acquired by BlackRock for $12 billion), chosen specifically for his infrastructure expertise as OpenAI scrambles to secure data centre capacity.
On the policy side, Minister Bosun Tijani has already laid important groundwork – a national AI strategy, international partnerships, and a publicly stated agenda that identifies computing power and clean energy as critical national needs. The intent is there. What is needed now is a coordinated policy architecture to translate that intent into operational investment.
None of this is simple. Nigeria’s track record on large infrastructure programmes is mixed. Regulatory unpredictability, contract enforcement concerns, and fuel supply reliability are real barriers. But the cost of inaction is now equally concrete: $720 million burnt annually in wasted gas, 85 million Nigerians without reliable electricity, and a narrowing window to capture a multibillion-dollar market that will be built somewhere in the world regardless of whether Nigeria participates.
The question is not whether this opportunity exists. The data confirms it does. The question is whether Nigeria will act with the speed and coordination that a closing global window demands.
Nigeria has been called a country of enormous, unrealised potential so many times that the phrase has almost lost meaning. This moment is different. The world’s most capital-intensive industry needs what Nigeria is currently burning. That convergence does not happen twice.




